BitMEX issued a scathing critique of ripple. They conclude that ripple does not share any characteristics with bitcoin or ethereum from a technical viewpoint. They cite that ripple was conceived to enable peer to peer network where parties could directly lend funds among themselves. They feel the ‘trust’ involved between the parties is unreliable and this puts into doubt the viability as a long term currency.

The main issue is that the primary parties are a few large banks and the system is more or less a centralized platform. They point out that ripple’s distribution of reserves to founding members and employees, they are not critical of the distribution but the question way it was done. Adding to this the rumors of internal disputes among the staff. See this article from Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2018/01/02/meet-the-crypto-billionaires-getting-rich-from-ripples-xrp/#7a9946cf3289

BitMEX upon examining the way ripple works has difficulty in understanding ripple’s inner working or how it has any of the convergent properties necessary for consensus systems. See attached photo, courtesy of thenextweb.com.

Lastly, BitMEX discovered that ripple appears to be missing 32,570 blocks from the start of the ledger and nodes are not able to obtain this data.

You Better Hodl That Stish!

Join The SteemThat Movement

SteemThat.com Helping Steemians Grow.

Comments Reward You And The Author.

Eric Binkley It sounds like ripple is using the blockchain in a hybrid fashion. Which is the future of blockchain until blockchain developes out which is 5 years away.
2 weeks ago
Eric Binkley We need a good story of how we came to be. I shall share it soon.
2 weeks ago
Categories: CryptoCurrency

Eric Binkley avatar

binkley

Funny Family Guy Building Something For Everyone To Be Able To Grow On Steemit.com. The Founder Of https://SteemThat.com " Helping Steemians Gorw!" and The Creator of Stish currently traded on Radex @ https://exchange.rados.io/exchange/stish-eth | How Minnows Build A Whale Pool!

3 Comments

Comments are closed.